About

Everything that could stand in here stands in some other form in my postings. I am an anti-speciesist, but I object any forms of group-building, because I consider groups as counterproductive, because they eliminate the possibilities of the individual.

I can only act as an individual, so I also don’t expect any people belonging to any group to be interested in what I try to say here, and I am not saying anything in order to reach a specific “target group” or “sector of society”.

What I say here is said for the sake of having been said. It’s enough, sometimes, to just postulate something, so that you create yourself a “space for thought” (I don’t find spaces for thought anywhere where I could find them … especially not spaces for thoughts about “new concerns”. The “new” (thought, idea, concept) is viewed under the scrutinous eyes of the the academics, who supposedly like to disapprove and invalidate fallacies of thought and argumentation, in reality though they tend do the opposite and prove and create fallacies (just think of where the discussion about normative thinking and normativeness is taking us – just an  example).

Many have either accepted scholars as their leaders of thought or have become silenced, because who wants to speak when he can’t get a group behind himself or herself.

Respectfully and critically yours,

An owner of a signature and “person” who doesn’t exist in “society” but in a self created space of thought that relates under own terms with other spaces of thought and existence.